Overview of the Gaps in the Healthcare Legislation in Georgia: Short-, Medium-, and Long-term Priorities

  • Author: Nino Kiknadze and Leo Beletsky

Summary

The study identified a number of serious inconsistencies, gaps, and conflicts in the definition and coverage of terms used in the national legislative canon pertinent to human rights in patient care. These include inconsistent definitions of key terms “informed consent” and “medical malpractice” across the legislative landscape. Imprecise and overly broad drafting of legislation has left concepts like patient confidentiality and implied consent wide open to abuse. The field of health care provider rights was entirely missing from existing Georgian legislation. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind in Georgia. Gaps and inconsistencies uncovered were categorized based on a short-, medium-, and long-term action framework. Results were presented to key decision makers in Georgian ministerial and legislative institutions. Several of the major recommendations are currently being considered for inclusion into future legal reform.

Contact US

 

This site is supported by

 

Aspher

Association of Schools
of Public Health
in the European Region

 

 

Site created by YU-GO.RU